tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3088730811840642813.comments2023-05-19T13:23:54.271-02:30Loyal + ViewsUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger116125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3088730811840642813.post-42408463246674991532022-12-14T16:43:53.040-03:302022-12-14T16:43:53.040-03:30Greatt read thank youGreatt read thank youArden-Arcade Professional Organizerhttps://www.expert-organizers.com/us/home-organizers-california/arden-arcade-professional-organizer.shtmlnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3088730811840642813.post-82552677782389160782022-05-24T04:52:14.054-02:302022-05-24T04:52:14.054-02:30Great post much appreciate the time you took to wr...Great post much appreciate the time you took to write this. Dannyhttps://www.dannywinters.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3088730811840642813.post-89418255220162357832021-11-27T14:51:42.053-03:302021-11-27T14:51:42.053-03:30Are you ok? The way you typed, it sounds like you&...Are you ok? The way you typed, it sounds like you're mentally unwell.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3088730811840642813.post-30911352148840972992021-02-01T21:00:25.078-03:302021-02-01T21:00:25.078-03:30Very interesting blog, it reminds me of the Duomo ...Very interesting blog, it reminds me of the Duomo in Florence, designed by Arnolfo di Cambio with the dome by Filippo Brunelleschi. The bell tower was designed by Giotto. I tried to write a blog about it, hope you also like it: http://stenote.blogspot.com/2018/01/florence-at-piazza-del-duomo.htmlstenotehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01036496407806809635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3088730811840642813.post-22650770238174924542017-09-20T23:01:11.700-02:302017-09-20T23:01:11.700-02:30God bless you! (Found you on CAF)God bless you! (Found you on CAF)Adam Charles Hoveyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04498363750266726539noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3088730811840642813.post-133958003158527442016-02-22T03:31:36.331-03:302016-02-22T03:31:36.331-03:30If a man is not faithful to his own individuality,...If a man is not faithful to his own individuality, he cannot be <a href="http://www.ufgop.org/pdf/loyal" rel="nofollow">loyal</a> to anything. See the link below for more info. <br /><br /><br />#loyal <br />www.ufgop.orgAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07720547920308398294noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3088730811840642813.post-11573524593103476662014-08-11T21:52:42.470-02:302014-08-11T21:52:42.470-02:30Are you *currently* being sent into Hell forever ....Are you *currently* being sent into Hell forever ... automatically excommunicated (outside) of God’s Catholic Church ?<br /><br />Answer: Yes you are ... you can reverse it ... please continue.<br /><br />Council of Florence, Session 8, 22 Nov 1439 -- infallible Source of Dogma ><br />"Whoever wills to be saved, before all things it is necessary that he holds the Catholic faith. Unless a person keeps this faith whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish eternally."<br /><br />You must believe the Catholic Dogma to be in the Church ... Dogma you have *never* seen.<br /><br />Site > Immaculata-one.com ... infallible Dogma throughout.<br /><br />The Catholic Faith *is not* Bible interpretation ... it is the Catholic infallible Sources of Dogma. The Catholic Church didn’t even define the Bible’s New Testament Canon until 397 A.D. at the Council of Carthage.<br /><br />- - - -<br /><br />Can a group which enforces the opposite, the opposite, and the opposite of the Catholic unchangeable Dogma be the Catholic Church?<br /><br />No, it cannot possibly be the Catholic Church ... and promotion of the opposite of the Catholic Dogma is exactly what the vatican-2 heretic cult does ... and has been doing since it’s founding on 8 December 1965 at the Vatican.<br /><br />The vatican-2 heresy does not have the Office of the Papacy ... only the Catholic Church has the Papacy.<br /><br />The Dogma cannot “change” or be “reversed” ... God does not “change”.<br /><br />The founding documents of the vatican-2 heretic cult … the “vatican-2 council” documents … have well over 200 heresies *against* prior defined unchangeable Dogma. Every (apparent) bishop at the “council” approved the mountain of heresy, which caused their automatic excommunication, see Section 13.2 of the below site.<br /><br />- - - -<br /><br />Section 12 > Anti-Christ vatican-2 heresies (50 listed) ... followed by many Catholic corrections.<br /><br />Sections 13 and 13.1 > Photographic *proof* of heresy at the Vatican.<br /><br />Because of … the Catholic Dogma on automatic excommunication for heresy or for physical participation in a heretic cult (such as the v-2 cult) …<br /><br />… we were all placed, body and soul, *outside* of Christianity (the Catholic Church) on 8 December 1965 … the close date of the “council”.<br /><br />Section 13.2 > Catholic Dogma on automatic excommunication for heresy or participating in a heretic cult such as ... vatican-2, lutheran, methodist, evangelical, etc.<br /><br />Section 107 > St. Athanasius (died 373 A.D.) ... “Even if the Church were reduced to a handful ...” - - during the “arian” heresy ... we are there again, but worse.<br /><br />Section 13.3 > Matt 16:18, Gates of Hell scripture ... is *not* about the Office of the Papacy ... four Dogmatic Councils defined it ... that heresy will not cause the Dogma to disappear.<br /><br />Section 13.4 > The vatican-2 heretic cult does not have the Office of the Papacy only the Catholic Church has the Papacy.<br /><br />Section 13.6 > The Catholic Dogma on Jurisdiction and Automatic Excommunication for heresy define that ... God has allowed Catholic Jurisdiction ... for Mass and Confession to disappear from the world. There is no such thing as Catholic Mass outside of the Catholic Church.<br /><br />Non-Catholic heresies such as “vatican-2”, “sspx”, “sspv”, “cmri”, etc. ... do not have Catholic Mass.<br /><br />Section 19.1 > Dogma on Abjuration for *re-entering* Christianity (the Catholic Church) … after being automatically excommunicated. A Formal Abjuration is provided here also.<br /><br />Section 10.2 > Returning to a state of grace, in places and times when Confession is not available, like now.<br /><br />- - - -<br /><br />Second Council of Constantinople, 553 A.D. -- infallible Source of Dogma ><br />"The heretic, even though he has not been condemned formally by any individual, in reality brings anathema on himself, having cut himself off from the way of truth by his heresy."<br /><br />Blessed John Eudes, died 1680 ><br />“The greatest evil existing today is heresy, an infernal rage which hurls countless souls into eternal damnation.”<br /><br />Everything you must know, believe, and do to get to Heaven is on > > Immaculata-one.com.<br /><br />Victoria<br />Our Lady of Conquest<br />Pray for uspleptio 1stAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15324557614200501175noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3088730811840642813.post-42086878015448237962013-06-05T11:41:07.697-02:302013-06-05T11:41:07.697-02:30sspx no jurisdiction from a true Pope and thus not...sspx no jurisdiction from a true Pope and thus not Catholic. read satis cognitum, Pope Leo 13, or www.JMJsite.com or www.betrayedcatholics.com. pray for the consecration of russia to the IHM. it will be done too to late. God will restore His True ChurchAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3088730811840642813.post-45620941533169194252013-04-07T00:31:26.318-02:302013-04-07T00:31:26.318-02:30OF course, you realize now self-respecting Penteco...OF course, you realize now self-respecting Pentecostal church would use this? Far too "accoustic" in that it does not lend itself to electric guitar and drum kit.<br /><br />And while the song is indeed lightweight (not a universal proof of unworthyness) the scripture from which it is a pretty direct quote, <i>Zephaniah 3:14 ff</i> is not. <br /><br />I have to admit though, I can see the potential for some dramatically bad dance!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3088730811840642813.post-21365421737030911772013-01-25T21:34:38.631-03:302013-01-25T21:34:38.631-03:30Articles 15 through 18 of the Syllabus of Pope Piu...Articles 15 through 18 of the Syllabus of Pope Pius IX - "Universal Salvation" is heresy.<br /><br />"Cum ex Apostolatus Officio" Pope Paul IV, Feb 1559.<br /><br />All of the usurpers of the Chair of St. Peter since October 9, 1958 have publicly declared "Universal Salvation". Ergo, there has been no Pope (only usurpers) since Pope Pius XII!! Fiat accompli! Facts, not opinion!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3088730811840642813.post-23731466376599231492012-11-28T12:18:58.495-03:302012-11-28T12:18:58.495-03:30Wednesday, November 28, 2012
WASHINGTON POST REPOR...Wednesday, November 28, 2012<br />WASHINGTON POST REPORT ON SSPX WRONG ON CATHOLIC DOCTRINE<br /> <br />There is a Washington Post report with the same factual errors on Vatican Council II and the SSPX and there is no clarification from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith or the Ecclesia Dei.Explicit implicit salvation is not Catholic doctrine.<br /><br />The report says <br />Pope tells SSPX traditionalists they must accept Second Vatican Council By Alessandro Speciale<br />Religion News Service, Oct 01, 2012 AP Published: September 27 ,2012<br /> http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/on-faith/pope-tells-sspx-traditionalists-they-must-accept-second-vatican-council/2012/09/27/bc1cc674-08dc-11e2-9eea-333857f6a7bd_story.html<br /><br />1.<br /><br />The SSPX has said that they accept Vatican Council II as an historical event.Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre participated in it. At issue is the interpretation of Vatican Council II with the visible dead premise.<br /><br />There is no known salvation outside the church, every on earth needs faith and baptism for salvation(AG 7). The text of Vatican Council II or the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 does not state that there is known salvation.It does not make this non traditional claim.Yet the media implies it does and Catholics assume that this is a fact and the Vatican does not issue a correction.<br /><br />Implicit desire is part of the deposit of the faith, explicit implicit desire is not.The Washington Post correspondent assumes Vatican Council II mentions explicit exceptions to Tradition.<br /><br />The Washington Post report says:<br /><br />The SSPX rejects the modernizing reforms of the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965), including church acceptance of ecumenism and religious freedom, and its rejection of anti-Semitism<br />2. <br />Vatican Council II (AG 7) is in agreement with the Catholic Church's traditional teaching on other religions and ecumenism. All need Catholic faith and the baptism of water for salvation(AG 7). So Vatican Council II agrees with the Society of St.Pius ( SSPX ) traditional position on this issue- unless one assumes there are known cases of the deceased saved. This is the error of the writer of the report. Since we cannot see the dead LG 16 (invincible ignorance/ good conscience), LG 8 ( elements of sanctification),AG 11(seeds of the word) etc,.do not contradict AG 7 or the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.So Vatican Council II has not changed the Catholics Church's teachings on other religions as the media reports.<br /><br />This report is similar to the one written by the Reuters Religious Editor .He also assumes the dead who are saved are visible on earth.So he implies these deceased are explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus i.e Vatican Council II contradicts the dogma and the Syllabus of Errors .<br /><br />There was no clarification from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and Ecclesia Dei. It needed to be clarified that implicit salvation is never explicit for us .We cannot see the deceased on earth.Vatican Council II does not state that these cases are visible or that they contradict the salvation dogma.-Lionel Andrades<br /><br />REUTERS MAKES AN OBJECTIVE MISTAKE ON CATHOLIC DOCTRINE AND ECCLESIA DEI/ CDF DO NOT CLARIFY<br />http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/11/reuters-makes-objective-mistake-on.html#links<br /><br />REUTERS MAKES FACTUAL,OBJECTIVE MISTAKE TOO<br />http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/11/reuters-makes-factualobjective-mistake.html#links <br />Catholic Missionhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06025127342963192930noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3088730811840642813.post-11618200828525001612012-08-27T19:56:57.353-02:302012-08-27T19:56:57.353-02:30we should wish david bell happy anniversary on the...we should wish david bell happy anniversary on the 14 September, as he celebrates his wedding anniversary to his male partner. 5 years as a civil couple. Wonder if the Vatican knows this yet?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3088730811840642813.post-58694930861815808232012-08-25T16:19:08.638-02:302012-08-25T16:19:08.638-02:30Wow. I agree with you: I would expect to see this ...Wow. I agree with you: I would expect to see this in a baby's bedroom but definitely not in God's house!<br /><br />I have seen my share of inappropriate things in churches, too:<br />http://frenchandcatholic.wordpress.com/2012/07/23/and-so-with-all-the-choirs-of-angels-in-heaven-we-applaud/Davidhttp://frenchandcatholic.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3088730811840642813.post-29922394839175261222012-07-31T05:34:23.378-02:302012-07-31T05:34:23.378-02:30WHEN WILL THE BISHOPS OF THE WORLD REALIZE THAT WE...WHEN WILL THE BISHOPS OF THE WORLD REALIZE THAT WE DO NOT KNOW ANY VISIBLE DEAD SO VATICAN COUNCIL II IS A PRO SSPX TRADITIONAL DOCUMENT ?<br /> <br />There is no dead person visible who has been saved with the baptism desire. So if the Holy Office in 1949 assumed there were, it was a mistake. It was a factual mistake since we cannot see such a person.<br /><br />Do all the bishops in the world agree that we cannot see the dead saved in invincible ignorance, the baptism of desire, imperfect communion with the Church, seeds of the Word and a good conscience ?<br /><br />So if we cannot see all these deceased then there are no known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.If nothing in Vatican Council II contradicts the dogma outside the church there is no salvation then we are back to exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church.<br /><br />If Vatican Council II says outside the church there is no salvation (Ad Gentes says all need Catholic Faith) then the Society of St Pius X (SSPX) have a traditional Vatican Council II before them. There are traditional Conciliar values on other religions and ecumenism. The ecclesiology is once again traditional. <br /><br />The bishops through out the world must realize that it is the traditionalists who are affirming Vatican Council II and it is Bishop Gerhard Muller and Archbishop Augustine Di Noia who are denying the traditional interpretation. They are denying it because they assume that Lumen Gentium 16 is an exception to the dogma and to Ad Gentes 7. And why do they assume that ? Since for them, we can see the dead-visible. They can see the deceased saved in invincible ignorance etc who are exceptions to the dogma!.<br /><br />Can the bishops see all this?<br /><br />Can they state in public that Vatican Council II is a traditional document in agreement with the SSPX communique (July 19, 2012) affirming that outside the Church there is no salvation and endorsing the uninterrupted magisterium of the Catholic Church.<br /><br />This is not just an SSPX issue. It is a problem, all the bishops must face. Firstly we do not know the deceased who are saved and are alive and who could be exceptions to the dogma. Secondly, since there are no exceptions Vatican Council II (AG 7) affirms the dogma outside the church there is no salvation.Thirdly, we still have the traditional ecclesiology , ecumenism, evangelisation etc. These SSPX values are pro-Vatican Council II.<br /><br />So when the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Prefect says the SSPX must accept Vatican Council II the answer is "Yes , they have! But what about you Bishop Muller ?".<br /><br />That three SSPX bishops also do not know all this is part of the problem.-Lionel Andrades <br />1. <br />APPEAL TO BISHOP MULLER TO ACCEPT VATICAN COUNCIL II <br />http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/07/appeal-to-bishop-muller-to-accept.html<br /><br />CAN THE ARCHDIOCESE OF BOSTON AND WASHINGTON SUPPORT THE SSPX BY SAYING VATICAN COUNCIL II IS A TRADITIONAL DOCUMENT WITH TRADITIONAL VALUES?<br />http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/07/can-archdiocese-of-boston-and.htmlCatholic Missionhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06025127342963192930noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3088730811840642813.post-90026722884722220742012-07-25T12:38:52.037-02:302012-07-25T12:38:52.037-02:30SSPX ASK BISHOP GERHARD MULLER TO ANSWER THE TWO Q...SSPX ASK BISHOP GERHARD MULLER TO ANSWER THE TWO QUESTIONS WHICH CARDINAL SEAN O'MALLEY WILL NOT : ENTIRE CONCEPT OF VATICAN COUNCIL II CHANGES<br /> <br />The Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) communique ( July 19, 2012) supports the priest from Boston on whom the Archdiocese placed sanctions.<br /><br />This is why its seems to us opportune to reaffirm our faith in the Roman Catholic Church, the only Church founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ, outside of which there is no salvation and no possibility of finding the means that lead to it; in its monarchical constitution, willed by Our Lord, which means that the supreme power of governance over the whole Church belongs to the pope alone, the Vicar of Christ on earth; in the universal kingship of Our Lord Jesus Christ, the creator of the natural and supernatural order, to whom every human being and all society must submit. - SSPX Communique(Emphasis added).<br />The SSPX communique is saying there is no possibility of finding the means of salvation outside the Catholic Church. It is not possible to know anyone with implicit desire or who will be saved in invincible ignorance. Humanly this is not real.<br /><br />It is possible to accept in theory, in faith and in pricniple that someone can be saved in invincible ignorance or a good conscience (LG 16) but not as a known possibility on earth. The SSPX is affirming the literal interpretation of the dogma as was done by Fr.Leonad Feeney. So they are answering positively the two questions asked of the Archdiocese of Boston weeks back and to which there is no response. The two questions are:<br /><br />1) Do we personally know the dead saved in invincible ignorance, a good conscience (LG 16) etc ?<br /><br />2) Since we do not know any of these cases, there are no known exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ?<br /><br />If the SSPX would ask Bishop Gerhard Muller to respond to these two questions the CDF Prefect would have the same understanding of Vatican Council II as the SSPX.Probably this frightens the Archdiocese of Boston .<br /><br />We now know that Fr.Leonard Feeney the priest from Boston answered the two questions in harmony with Tradition and was falsely penalized for rejecting the baptism of desire, as if the baptism of desire was relevant to the literal interpretation of the dogma.<br /><br />If Cardinal Gerhard Muller says that the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston rejected the literal interpretation of the dogma, then it means there was an objective mistake made by the Holy Office.The baptism of desire is not an exception to the dogma. It is irrelevant to the dogma.<br /><br />If Cardinal Muller agrees that we do not know the dead saved then it means LG 16 is not an exception to the dogma.So there is nothing in Vatican Council II or the Catechism of the Catholic Chruch which contradicts the literal interpretation of the dogma as expressed in the SSPX communique. We do not know anyone saved with 'elements of sanctification' (LG 8), seeds of the Word, in imperfect communion with the Church and other implicit cases known only to God.<br /><br />So holding the literal interpretation of the dogma is an affirmation of Vatican Council II according to Tradition. Ad Gentes 7 supports Fr.Leonard Feeney and the SSPX position while LG 16, LG 8 etc are not known exceptions.-Lionel AndradesCatholic Missionhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06025127342963192930noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3088730811840642813.post-63063968688816751552012-07-25T12:37:20.979-02:302012-07-25T12:37:20.979-02:30THE SSPX ACCEPTS VATICAN COUNIL II ACCORDING TO TR...THE SSPX ACCEPTS VATICAN COUNIL II ACCORDING TO TRADITION (DOGMA): SECONDARY ISSUES PREVENT RECONCILIATION<br /> <br />The SSPX accepts Vatican Council according to Tradition and rejects the Council as a break from Tradition and so will criticize the non traditional version which rejects the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.<br /><br /><br />According to Vatican Insider there are three conditions presented by the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) to the Vatican before they can accept Vatican Council II and receive canonical recognition. <br /><br /><br /><br />Here are the conditions: <br /><br /><br />1.“The freedom to preserve, share and teach the sound doctrine of the constant Magisterium of the Church and the unchanging truth of the divine tradition and the freedom to accuse and even to correct the promoters of the errors or the innovations of modernism, liberalism, and Vatican II and its aftermath.” Discerning Catholics will always criticize the we-can-see-the-dead-version of Vatican Council II.<br /><br /><br /><br />The Muller-Koch-Ladaria-Di Noia version of Vatican Council II claims those dead and saved in invincible ignorance, the baptism of desire,elements of sanctification tc are known exceptions to the dogma on exclusive salvation. This results in a new interpretation of Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church.<br /><br /><br />They want the SSPX to accept this error and not criticize them for their irrationality.<br /><br /><br /><br />2. The exclusive use of the Liturgy of 1962. The retention of the sacramental practice that we currently maintain (including: orders, confirmation, and marriage). <br /><br /><br /><br />3.‘The letter also includes other conditions which are considered desirable but not essential: the possibility of having a separate ecclesiastical court of the first instance; the exemption of the houses of the Society of St. Pius X from the diocesan bishops and a Pontifical Commission for the tradition of Rome, which depends directly from the Pope, with the majority of the members and the president in favour of tradition.’ <br /><br /><br />The SSPX has accepted Vatican Council II with the hermeneutic of continuity, they are in accord with Tradition (the dogma). <br /><br /><br /><br />The issue really is no more Vatican Council II which the SSPX accepts according to the dogma as indicated in their communique of July 19,2012. Here it is:<br /><br /><br />This is why its seems to us opportune to reaffirm our faith in the Roman Catholic Church, the only Church founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ, outside of which there is no salvation and no possibility of finding the means that lead to it; in its monarchical constitution, willed by Our Lord, which means that the supreme power of governance over the whole Church belongs to the pope alone, the Vicar of Christ on earth; in the universal kingship of Our Lord Jesus Christ, the creator of the natural and supernatural order, to whom every human being and all society must submit. - SSPX Communique (Emphasis added).<br />According to the SSPX version of Vatican Council II all non Catholics need to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation (to avoid Hell) and there can only be an ecumenism of return.-Lionel AndradesCatholic Missionhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06025127342963192930noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3088730811840642813.post-72309276089948345832012-07-16T12:54:45.945-02:302012-07-16T12:54:45.945-02:30Thanks be to God!Thanks be to God!Rochester Catholicnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3088730811840642813.post-5460269301050787992012-06-27T17:57:14.963-02:302012-06-27T17:57:14.963-02:30Can't wait to see Fr. Frank at this coming yea...Can't wait to see Fr. Frank at this coming year's March to Life so I could congratulate him in person! Way to go Priests for Life! Now this is a pure example of obedience to the Magesterium, perserverance and total faith! It gives all pro-lifers a push to be diligent in their work to save lives come what may! Truly this is a time to celebrate!<br /><br />I love you Fr. Frank, <br />AllaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3088730811840642813.post-64009822854178477082012-06-27T17:24:08.437-02:302012-06-27T17:24:08.437-02:30Oh my gosh!!! This is wonderful news!!! If the Vat...Oh my gosh!!! This is wonderful news!!! If the Vatican is making this kind of decision, then any 'financial' trouble that Father Pavone was accused of having is unfounded. As I knew it was. <br /><br />Hooray Father Pavone! Now let's end abortion and kick those pro-death liberals out of office!!!bluzmilehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00270024102309321495noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3088730811840642813.post-14721312862716812452012-06-25T23:18:53.781-02:302012-06-25T23:18:53.781-02:30No he's out now as I understand it! He just tu...No he's out now as I understand it! He just turnt 91.<br /><br />The Duke of Edinburgh programme is described here, much better than I possible could...<br />http://www.dofe.org/<br />http://www.dukeofed.org/<br /><br />I'll soon be helping with it...Colm Thomashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14820973023817185372noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3088730811840642813.post-77821493907605128982012-06-25T20:00:05.508-02:302012-06-25T20:00:05.508-02:30Dido, Cameron, you're absolutely right. God gr...Dido, Cameron, you're absolutely right. God grants life, and it is God's alone to take. Your relative was brave to choose to wait on God. <br /><br />There's a really good quote involving a lingering death by Isaac Watts. I posted it on my blog in the post "Thoughts upon the image of death..."Pearl of Tyburnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06454820098627801613noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3088730811840642813.post-49214092796587454102012-06-25T19:56:07.907-02:302012-06-25T19:56:07.907-02:30I hope you enjoyed the Jubilee bash with all it...I hope you enjoyed the Jubilee bash with all it's trimmings! That's one thing that I'm afraid we Americans missed out on :-( However, I did get a little Union Jack to put in my Canadian mug for the occasion :-)<br /><br />What exactly is the Duke of Edinburgh programme? By the way, is Prince Philip still in the hospital?Pearl of Tyburnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06454820098627801613noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3088730811840642813.post-26138802413996685822012-06-25T19:52:30.064-02:302012-06-25T19:52:30.064-02:30Hi, Cameron!
I love the picture of Queen Victori...Hi, Cameron! <br /><br />I love the picture of Queen Victoria you posted. She looks so young and regal. By the way, I really enjoyed the movie with Emily Blunt called "The Young Victoria". <br /><br />Even though Victoria is not one of my favorite monarchs, and I do believe she could have done more to help the potato famine victums, I thought the film was a very interesting portrayal of a part of Victoria that we rarely see.<br /><br />She was the longest reigning monarch, and she has become a symbol of Britishness and tradition. So here's a belated health to the day! My ginger-ale glass is raised aloft!Pearl of Tyburnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06454820098627801613noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3088730811840642813.post-41283896631473460002012-05-19T17:22:48.584-02:302012-05-19T17:22:48.584-02:30ARCHBISHOP MARCEL LEFEBVRE ACKNOWLEDGED INVINCIBLE...ARCHBISHOP MARCEL LEFEBVRE ACKNOWLEDGED INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE AND IMPLICIT DESIRE BUT DID NOT SAY THAT THEY WERE EXCEPTIONS TO THE DOGMA: IT IS THE SSPX BISHOPS AND PRIESTS WHO ASSUME IT IS <br /><br />In two quotations on this subject Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre the founder of the Society of St.Pius X has said ‘I repeat, it is possible for someone to be saved in these religions, but they are saved by the Church, and so the formulation is true: Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus. This must be preached.” [Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Against the Heresies, pp. 217-218] Elsewhere he has said that there could be people in other religions saved with implicit desire.<br /><br />He has not said that these cases are known to us and so they are explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.<br /><br />It is the SSPX bishops and priests who assume that they are. They assume that implicit desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are explicitly known in the present time.<br /><br />The Archbishop did not say this.<br /><br />If only the SSPX bishops could see it! <br /><br />1. Implicit desire etc is not an exception to the literal interpretation of the dogma according to Fr.Leonard Feeney.<br /><br />2. The Archbishop did not say it was.<br /><br />3. If the SSPX bishops can realize this then LG 16 is not an exception to the literal ‘formulation’ of extra ecclesiam nulla salus which ‘must be preached’.<br /><br />4. Then Vatican Council II (AG 7) supports their position on ecumenism and other religions.<br /><br />5. Then can tell their Jewish critics that :<br />“We accept Vatican Council II and it says Jews need to convert for salvation while invincible ignorance and a good conscience (LG 16) are not explicit exceptions to the dogma or AG 7.<br /><br />'So if you say before entering the Catholic Church we should accept Vatican Council II we accept the Council knowing that invincible ignorance etc are not known to us. We reject your interpretation of Vatican Council in which you irrationally assume that invincible ignorance etc are explicit and known to us in the present time and so they are an exception to the defined dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and also to Vatican Council (AG 7) and are position on ecumenism and other religions.'<br />-Lionel AndradesCatholic Missionhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06025127342963192930noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3088730811840642813.post-42606896404866586402012-05-19T07:12:36.993-02:302012-05-19T07:12:36.993-02:30Saturday, May 19, 2012
SSPX ENDORSES VATICAN COUNC...Saturday, May 19, 2012<br />SSPX ENDORSES VATICAN COUNCIL II WHICH SAYS BUDDHISTS, MUSLIMS, JEWS NEED TO CONVERT FOR SALVATION: MEDIA MISINFORMED<br /><br />Therefore, all ( Buddhists, Jews, Muslisms) must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him (for salvation) by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door.-Ad Gentes 7,Vatican Council II (emphasis added)<br /><br />Jewish Left media are welcoming Cardinal Kurt Koch’s ADL-approved talk at the Angelicum University in Rome on May 16. The cardinal’s talk was organised by a rabbi it seems to get the pro-Israel message out before a decision is taken on the SSPX (Society of St.Pius X).<br /><br />At this ‘interfaith’ meeting of liberals no one commented on Vatican Council II text which indicates Jews need to convert (AG 7) and that Catholics are the new people of God (NA 4). They are the Chosen People now.<br /><br />Vatican Council II (AG 7) says outside the Church there is no salvation and it agrees with the thrice defined dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus-but this will not be reported.<br /><br />Imagine the genuine panic if Bishop Richard Williamson of the SSPX says he rejects Vatican Council II (Koch version), accepts Ad Gentes 7 and knows that Lumen Gentium 16 is not an explicit exception of AG 7 or the dogma outside the church no salvation. So many years of false propaganda and liberal ideology will collapse.<br /><br />Catholics will know the truth.<br /><br />What the media attribute to the SSPX and a ‘sect’ they will realize is the mainstream, official teaching of the Catholic Church.<br /><br />So when the media reports that there are doctrinal differences between the SSPX and the Vatican it is amusing. The SSPX can cite text from Vatican Council II, if they want to. Koch cannot.<br /><br />Nostra Aetate does not state anywhere that Jews do not have to convert for salvation or that Jews are saved in general in their religion or that Judaism is the ordinary means of salvation.<br /><br />Cardinal Kurt Koch would find no text in the Council to support his claim at the Angelicum that Jews do not have to convert ‘in the present time’.<br /><br />At the Angelicum Koch was dis regarding Vatican Council II (AG /), the Bible (John 3:5, Mk. 16:16 etc), the Nicene Creed (‘I believe in one baptism’), Dominus Iesus 20, the Catechism of the Catholic Church 845,846) etc.<br /><br />When liberals meet in ‘interfaith’ one cannot expect anyone from the Angelicum to stand up and correct them. These lies are taught also by the professors there and the students have learnt to accept it.-Lionel AndradesCatholic Missionhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06025127342963192930noreply@blogger.com